Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 10
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 41-49

Problems and challenges of nursing students' clinical evaluation: A qualitative study

1 Department of Medical and Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Department of Medical and Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Cardiology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
4 Department of Psychiatry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, shiraz, Iran

Correspondence Address:
Marzieh Moattari
Nursing Professor, Department of Medical and Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: The present article was extracted from the thesis written by Ghazanfar Rafi ee and was fi nancially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, grant number: 90-5627, Conflict of Interest: None

PMID: 24554959

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: The purpose of this qualitative exploratory study was to explore the views of nursing trainers and students about nursing students' clinical evaluation problems and drawbacks in Shiraz Nursing and Midwifery School. Materials and Methods: A qualitative exploratory approach was used in this study at Shiraz Nursing and Midwifery School in 2012. A purposeful sample of 8 nursing instructors and 40 nursing students was interviewed and the data on their opinions about the problems of the clinical evaluation were collected through semi-structured deep interviews. Initially, four open-ended questions, which were related to the clinical evaluation status, problems, were used to stimulate discussions in the interview sessions. Content analysis was employed in order to analyze the transcribed data. The recorded interviews were initially transcribed, read, and reread on a number of occasions to get an overall feeling of what the participants were saying. Each line or incident was described, and then a code, which reflected the essence of the participants' comments, was given. Results: The codes were compared for similarity and differences, merged together, and categorized. Finally, five themes emerged: In appropriate clinical evaluation method, problems of clinical evaluation Process, problems related to clinical instructors, unsuitable programming of clinical education, and organizational shortcomings. Conclusion: Besides focusing on upgrading the current clinical evaluation forms, nursing trainers should improve their knowledge about a complete and comprehensive clinical evaluation. They should also apply other appropriate and objective clinical evaluation methods and tools, and perform a formative and summative clinical evaluation. Also, workload adjustment of the nursing trainers needs revision. Therefore, despite using traditional and sometimes limited evaluation methods for assessing nursing students, a co mprehensive and appropriate evaluation of nursing students' clinical competencies seems necessary.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded100    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal