|
 |
| SHORT COMMUNICATION |
|
| Year : 2019 | Volume
: 24
| Issue : 4 | Page : 306-309 |
|
Occupational stress among critical care nurses: A comparative study of public and private sector
Zahra Chegini
Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics; Students' Research Committee, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz; Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
| Date of Web Publication | 27-Jun-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Zahra Chegini
School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah St, Tabriz - 5165665811
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_218_18
Background: Occupational stress, and the unfavorable consequences associated with it, is something frequently experienced by nurses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study comparing occupational stress experienced in public and private hospitals was conducted in Iran during 2017 and involved 203 critical care nurses. Data were obtained through a self-administered questionnaire and was analyzed using an independent sample t-test. Results: The overall mean (SD) score of occupational stress experienced by critical care nurses in public hospitals was greater than that experienced in private hospitals; 3.65 (0.77) vs. 3.18 (0.94). This difference was statistically significant (t = 3.77, p < 0.001). Among the five dimensions of occupational stress, the highest mean (SD) scores in both public and private hospitals related to organizational policies, the respective scored was 3.66 (0.94) and 3.34 (1.18). Conclusions: Hospital managers, especially those in public hospitals, should review existing organizational policies and improve the workplace environment in order to decrease occupational stress.
Keywords: Comparative study, critical care nurses, Iran, occupational stress
How to cite this article:
Chegini Z. Occupational stress among critical care nurses: A comparative study of public and private sector. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2019;24:306-9 |
| Introduction | |  |
The role that nurses have in the provision of first-line care services is significant and their job is naturally stressful.[1] The occupational stress experienced by nurses has been shown to have negative consequence for patient outcomes [2] and is associated with low levels of productivity and job performance.[3] A recent study has shown that 71% of Iranian Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses experienced high levels of stress.[4] Our earlier study conducted in hospitals in Tabriz also showed high levels of occupational stress among critical care nurses.[5]
An ICU nurse's job is characterized by an excessive workload, a need for fast decision making regarding patient care, and working with highly developed technologies.[6] ICU nurses are also thought to experience more occupational stress than nurses working on general wards.[7] It has been argued that because of an increasing elderly population and the growing burden of chronic illnesses, the need for critical care is projected to grow quickly.[8] Furthermore, differences in job-related stress between public and private hospitals have been noted.[9]
According to a National Health Account's (NHA) report, 70% of Iranian hospitals are in the public sector, whereas private hospitals account for almost 15% of the total number of hospitals.[10] Studies have shown that environmental differences between public and private hospitals can result in stress among nurses [9],[11] and understanding work place stressors and how these are coped with has attracted interest over recent decades.[6] Recognizing the importance of assessing the workplace stressors that exist in public and private hospitals and the differences between them, the aim of this study was to examine the perceived occupational stress levels experienced by ICU nurses working in both public and private hospitals in Tabriz, Northwest Iran.
| Materials and Methods | | |
This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted between July and November 2017 and a two-stage sampling method was used for data collection. The first stage saw the selection of five public and five private hospitals operating in Tabriz, Iran with selection based on the inclusion criterion of having a minimum of 200 beds. From these hospitals, 17 ICU managers agreed to participate in the study and 500 nurses working in these 17 ICUs formed the study population. Based on a previous study,[12] a sample size of 240 nurses, a 95% confidence interval, a precision of 0.05, and a power factor of 0.8 was calculated. At the second stage, a list of critical care nurses was provided by the authorities of the selected hospitals and, based on simple random sampling with replacement methods, the predetermined numbers were selected using the inclusion criteria of being a full-time clinical nurse, having at least 1 year experience and being willing to participate in the study.
To collect data, the morning shifts in the selected hospitals were targeted and eligible nurses were asked to complete a questionnaire, either in the workplace or at home returning them no more than 1 week after the date of completion. A self-administered occupational stress questionnaire together with demographics information was used to collect data. The reliability coefficient of the scale had been computed previously [8] and the Cronbach's alpha for overall occupational stress was found to be 0.82, in the present study this was established as being 0.93. To assess the validity of the questionnaire, formal and content validity was used. The questionnaire consisted of 30 questions that measured occupational stress in five dimensions that related to task, role-related stress, work-related stress, stress associated with organizational policies, and stress related to relationships between individuals. The questions were designed with a 5-option range (1 = very low, 5 = very high).
Data were analyzed using SPSS 17 (SPSS Inc., IL, Chicago, USA) and at a significance level of <0.05. For normalizing each domain of the occupational stress questionnaire on a 5-point Likert scale, the sum of raw scores of items in each domain was divided by the numbers of questions in each domain and, for overall occupational stress, the sum of raw scores of the items was divided by 30. Justified scores were varied between 1 and 5. The differences of occupational stress levels between private and public hospitals were also tested using independent t-tests.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. (Ethical code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1395.999). Participants were informed that their information would be anonymous and that participation in the study was voluntary. Study data were handled confidentially, and all nurses signed a consent form.
| Results | | |
Of the 240 questionnaires distributed, 203 were returned (response rate = 84.58%). Of these respondents, 79.80% (162) were women, 75.86% (154) were married, 93.59% (190) had a bachelor's degree and, in both sectors, 91.62% (186) had an income of less than 300 dollars. The mean (SD) age of the participants was 36.11 (7.76) in the public hospitals and 35.48 (9.04) in the private hospitals. The mean (SD) job experience of the nurses was 11.83 (7.23) years in the public hospitals and 10.70 (8.83) years in the private hospitals.
The overall mean (SD) score of occupational stress was 3.65 (0.77) in the public hospitals and 3.18 (0.94) in the private hospitals. [Table 1] shows that the mean score of three subscales relating to “duty related stressors,” “working environment-related stressors,” and “interpersonal relations-related stressors” of ICU nurses working in the public hospitals was greater than their private hospital colleagues and that these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant difference was demonstrated between the public and private sector hospitals in respect of the two subscales relating to “role-related stressors” and those relating to “organizational policies.” | Table 1: Relationship between sectors and occupational stress subscales among critical care nurses
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
The results showed that the average level of stress experienced by nurses in public hospitals was significantly greater than that experienced by nurses working in private hospitals. This may be seen as a reflection of the fact that burnout [13] and workload [14] are both higher for nurses working in public hospitals than for those working in private hospitals. Greater sense of job security is felt by nurses in private hospitals as compared with those in public hospitals may be seen as an additional reason.[15] Most Iranian hospitals operating in the public sector are teaching hospitals, they are overcrowded, and nurses have a heavy workload. The work environment in these public hospitals can be said to be inappropriate, staff receive insufficient payments, communications are ineffective, and there are low levels of organizational support for nurses.[16] Conversely, in private hospitals, more attention is given to the expectations and viewpoints of nurses [15] and the findings of a study conducted in Sudan [17] showed lower job stress among ICU nurses working in private hospitals. Although a scarcity of similar studies has made comparison difficult, it would be reasonable to conclude that the different levels of occupational stress experienced by nurses employed in the public as opposed to the private sector is attributed to these differences in workplace environments.
Organizational policies were found to be the most significant stressor in both public and private sector hospitals, a finding that reflects of Labrague et al.,[18] a study of private and public hospitals conducted in the Philippines. Labrague found that policies relating to promotion, encouragement, punishment, and organizational support were contributory factors in the development of workplace stress. A study conducted in Nepal [19] identified a lack of a psychological readiness and poor communication between colleagues as the principal causes of stress among critical care nurses.
In another study, stress was associated with the high expectations of patients and colleagues, an inadequate workforce, and lack of training,[11] and in a study conducted by Chatterjee and Roy, differences in organizational culture and in working conditions were observed in public and private sector hospitals. In Chatterjee and Roy's study, nurses employed in private hospitals were found to have more organizational role stress compared with their counterparts in public sector hospitals.[20] Given the limitations of cross-sectional studies and the generalizability of their results, the researcher recommend that further studies be carried out and that the use of qualitative methods exploring the lived experiences of nurses as a factor affecting occupational stress would add value to any results.
| Conclusion | | |
As organizational policies and working environment-related stressors were found to be the main cause of occupational stress in both public and private hospitals, managers should provide nurses with clear information about the purpose, structure, and practice of the hospital and a review of hospital policies should be conducted. A reasonable level of teamwork and socializing is often productive as it can help to create a friendly and safe working atmosphere and establishing proper communication with nurses, supporting them, and creating an appropriate environment for their professional activities is important.
Acknowledgements
This study was approved and supported by Tabriz University of Medical Science (No: 362). I would like to thank all those nurses who participated in this research for their efforts and I am grateful to Dr. Lizzie Abderrahim of the Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain for her help in editing this paper.
Financial support and sponsorship
School of management and medical informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Science
Conflicts of interest
Nothing to declare.
| References | | |
| 1. | Kemppainen V, Tossavainen K, Turunen H. Nurses' roles in health promotion practice: An integrative review. Health Promot Int 2013;28:490-501.  |
| 2. | Sarafis P, Rousaki E, Tsounis A, Malliarou M, Lahana L, Bamidis P, et al. The impact of occupational stress on nurses' caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nurs 2016;15:56. |
| 3. | Li L, Ai H, Gao L, Zhou H, Liu X, Zhang Z, et al. Moderating effects of coping on work stress and job performance for nurses in tertiary hospitals: A cross-sectional survey in China. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17:401. |
| 4. | Vahedian-Azimi A, Hajiesmaeili M, Kangasniemi M, Fornés-Vives J, Hunsucker RL, Rahimibashar F, et al. Effects of stress on critical care nurses: A national cross-sectional study. J Intensive Care Med 2017;34:311-22. |
| 5. | Chegini Z, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Kakemam E. Occupational stress, quality of working life and turnover intention amongst nurses. Crit Care Nurse 2019. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12419. |
| 6. | Hashemian SM, Farzanegan B, Fathi M, Ardehali SH, Vahedian-Azimi A, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, et al. Stress among Iranian nurses in critical wards. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2015;17:e22612. |
| 7. | Elshaer NS, Moustafa MS, Aiad MW, Ramadan MI. Job stress and burnout syndrome among critical care healthcare workers. Alexandria J Med 2017;54:273-7. |
| 8. | Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet 2010;376:1339-46. |
| 9. | Pires BSM, Oliveira LZFd, Siqueira CL, Feldman LB, Oliveira RA, Gasparino RC. Nurse work environment: Comparison between private and public hospitals. Einstein (São Paulo) 2018;16:1-6. |
| 10. | Hajizadeh M, Nghiem HS. Hospital care in Iran: An examination of national health system performance. Int J Healthc Manag 2013;6:201-10. |
| 11. | Chan ZC, Tam W, Lung MK, Wong W, Chau C. On nurses moving from public to private hospitals in Hong Kong. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:1382-90. |
| 12. | Mosadeghrad AM, Ferlie E, Rosenberg D. A study of relationship between job stress, quality of working life and turnover intention among hospital employees. Health Serv Manage Res 2011;24:170-81. |
| 13. | Katyal S. Burnout among nurses working in government and private hospitals. Stud Home Comm Sci 2013;7:83-5. |
| 14. | Nogueira LdS, Koike KM, Sardinha DS, Padilha KG, Sousa RM. Nursing workload in public and private intensive care units. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2013;25:225-32. |
| 15. | Sokhanvar M, Kakemam E, Chegini Z, Sarbakhsh P. Hospital nurses' job security and turnover intention and factors contributing to their turnover intention: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Midwifery Stud 2018;7:133-40. [Full text] |
| 16. | Farsi Z, Dehghan-Nayeri N, Negarandeh R, Broomand S. Nursing profession in Iran: An overview of opportunities and challenges. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2010;7:9-18. |
| 17. | Mohamedkheir RA, Amara ZM, Balla SA, Mohamed HAA. Occupational stress among nurses working in intensive care units in Public Hospitals of Khartoum State, Sudan 2016. Am J Public Health Res 2016;4:166-71. |
| 18. | Labrague L, McEnroe-Petitte D, Gloe D, Tsaras K, Arteche D, Maldia F. Organizational politics, nurses' stress, burnout levels, turnover intention and job satisfaction. Int Nurs Rev 2017;64:109-16. |
| 19. | Mehta R, Singh I. Stress among nurses working in critical care areas at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Nepal. J Chitwan Med Coll 2015;4:42-8. |
| 20. | Chatterjee M, Roy P. A comparative study on role satisfaction among nurses in public and private sector hospitals in and around Kolkata. Indian J Health Wellbeing 2018;9:837-40. |
[Table 1]
|
Search Pubmed for