|
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 26
| Issue : 1 | Page : 1-10 |
|
Scoping review on the concept of patient motivation and practical tools to assess it
Fatemeh Hosseini1, Negin Masoudi Alavi2, Eesa Mohammadi3, Zohreh Sadat2
1 PhD. Candidate of Nursing, Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
2 Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
| Date of Submission | 18-Jan-2020 |
| Date of Decision | 20-Jan-2020 |
| Date of Acceptance | 21-Sep-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 18-Jan-2021 |
Correspondence Address:
Prof. Negin Masoudi Alavi
Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan
Iran
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_15_20
Background: In this scoping review, the concept of patients' motivation and the tools that have been designed to measure this concept in clinical settings are presented. Materials and Methods: Arksey and O'Malley's framework was used in conducting the current scoping review. Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant English articles published between January 1995 and January 2020 using the keywords motivation and tool, and their synonyms. Out of 2820 articles, 34 articles were chosen and were entered into the final analysis. Definitions of patients' motivation were determined using Kyngäs et al., content analysis method. Results: The findings showed that new tools had been developed in 38% of the studies and other studies had revised or translated existing questionnaires. Moreover, 62% of the tools were used to measure patient motivation in mental disorders. Most of the studies did not clearly define the concept of patient motivation in the clinical environment. The findings of content analysis outlined the 3 categories of motivation determinant factors, decisions, and behaviors that determine overall levels of motivations and its consequences. Conclusions: Motivation is a dynamic concept and is a result of internal and external motives that lead to decisions and behaviors. There are limited tools for measuring motivation in clinical settings. This addresses the need to design specific tools in various diseases, especially chronic diseases. By the concept defined in this study, it is possible to design a short tool with general application that can be used in all diseases.
Keywords: Motivation, nurses, patients, review
How to cite this article:
Hosseini F, Alavi NM, Mohammadi E, Sadat Z. Scoping review on the concept of patient motivation and practical tools to assess it. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2021;26:1-10 |
How to cite this URL:
Hosseini F, Alavi NM, Mohammadi E, Sadat Z. Scoping review on the concept of patient motivation and practical tools to assess it. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2023 Mar 27];26:1-10. Available from: https://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2021/26/1/1/307337 |
| Introduction | |  |
Motives have a crucial role in developing individuals' psychical energy and guide people toward important activities, goals, and ultimately, successful performance.[1] Motivations are important in one's ability to recover from illness or disabling events, and to maintain health-enhancing behaviors. The Quality Of Life (QOL) and the ability to adapt and solve health-related problems are influenced by the individuals' motivations.[2] Patients' motivations provoke them to search for possible treatments and to follow these treatments in spite of their hardships and difficulties.[3] Therefore, it plays an essential role in determining the outcome of treatments and bearing its complications.[4] As long as the treatments are in accordance with the patient's motivation, the compliance will be satisfactory.[3] While some patients may have internal motivation to improve their health, others may require support.[2] Nurses can help patients in this regard, but, first, they should be able to determine patients' motives. This is crucial, especially in patients with chronic conditions because these patients need to be active in their self-care for a long time.
Nurses can promote patients' overall wellness by using a set of enhancing motivation techniques that improve health behavior and the quality of self-care.[5] Nurses can help patients overcome barriers that decrease internal motivations such as frustration and loss of hope. They can also provide support plans for external barriers. Using motivation enhancing methods successfully and evaluating their effectiveness requires suitable tools and scales for measuring patients' motivations. Accurate assessment of patient's motivation is an integral part of the nursing process.[6] Motivation tools can help nurses to assess the level of patients' motivation in a clinical environment. Therefore, they need to measure the quantity and quality of patient's motivation as a variable.
There are several tools with different definitions of motivation. The definition of the concept of motivation is different in these tools, for example, some studies have described motivation as a spiritual or religious phenomenon,[7] and others have described it as a patient's desire and a longing to continue living.[8] These differences can confuse nurses and reduce their confidence in using the tools. The objective of this study was to review the existing tools to assess the patient's motivation in the clinical environment and to determine the concept of motivation in these tools. This review might help nurses in selecting the right clinical tools and identifying knowledge gaps.
| Materials and Methods | | |
This scoping review is part of a PhD thesis entitled “Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Motivation for Healing Questionnaire in Cancer Patients”. The aim of this scoping review was to systematically evaluate the existing screening tools for the assessment of patients' motivation in clinical settings.
Based on this, the current scoping review uses an enhanced version of Arksey and O'Malley's framework. They published the first cognitive framework for guiding scoping review. The 5 proposed steps include identification of the research question, identification of related studies, selection of studies, classification of data collection tools, summary, and reporting results. The results of this proposed study will be presented according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).[9] The research questions are based on the research objective that was regulated using the Population/Context/Concept (PCC) framework.[10] Definitions of patients' motivations were determined using Kyngäs et al. content analysis method [Table 1].[6]
The first and secondary research questions were “Which patient's motivation tools are used in the clinical environment?” and “How is patient's motivation concept defined in the existing tools?” In the present review, Google Scholar (2100), PubMed (420), Scopus (200), and Web of Science databases (100) were searched for relevant English articles published between January 1995 and January 2020. The keywords included the terms “motivation” and “tool” and their synonyms including measurement, questionnaire, scale, and test.
The article selection criteria were written in English, use of a tool for measuring patient's motivation, presentation of the motivation in the title or keywords, and published in a peer-reviewed journal. In the initial review, authors independently screened articles to confirm whether the title and abstract were related to measuring motivation using a tool in a patient sample. Thus, 2820 articles were evaluated based on the selection criteria. From among them, 2720 articles were excluded because their full text was not accessible, or their subjects were not patients' motivation and they were about other concepts such as compliance, care takers' and nurses' motivations, quitting smoking, and exercise motivation, or there was a duplication of articles in databases. From the remaining 100 articles, 66 articles were eliminated because valid and reliable questionnaires had not been used in clinical settings and in adults. Any disagreement about the articles was resolved by the third author. Finally, the full text of 34 articles was entered into the final analysis [Figure 1].
All these articles were studied and evaluated based on information such as the title of the questionnaire, definition of motivation, purpose of designing the questionnaire, target population, country of origin, number of questions and subscales, and the underlying theory of the questionnaire [Table 2] and [Table 3].
Ethical considerations
The collected data were only used for scientific purposes, and the authorship and copyright rules was respected in the reporting and publication of the results. All articles obtained from the search were reviewed in the primary screening. They were not included in the study, if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The researchers did not interfere in the process of article selection. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran (KAMUS.NUHPM.REC.1398.053).
| Results | | |
In the present study, 34 articles that introduced a motivation questionnaire were included; 13 studies (38%) introduced tools that were designed for the first time and 21 (62%) articles revised or performed psychometric studies on existing questionnaires. Most of these questionnaires (91%) were completed by the individuals on their own; however, 3 questionnaires were completed with the help of an expert,[11],[12],[13] and 1 tool used a clinician's observations observational version of the motivation for treatment scale (MfT-O)].[14] Most of these tools were designed and scored according to rating scale. The score of each question varied from 4[15] to 10,[16] and the number of questions in each questionnaire varied from 4[17] to 85 questions.[18]
Most of the tools were related to patient's motivation in mental disorders. There were 9 tools (27%) that were indirectly related to the mental health field including 6 tools (18%) related to eating disorders,[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24] (1 tool related to drug abuse,[13] and 3 tools (9%) related to alcoholism[24],[25],[26] [Table 2]. The motivation tools for other diseases were limited to assessing the motivation of patients participating in post-traumatic stress rehabilitation,[12],[27] urinary incontinence control programs,[28],[29] and skeletal pain control programs [Table 2].[30]
In these studies, the concept of motivation had been defined in various ways. In 21 studies (65%), it was defined theoretically based on theories such as Self-Determination Theory (SDT)[13],[14],[18],[23],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35] or the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) model resulting from the theory of Ryan et al. (1989) theory of planned behavior.[36],[37] The transtheoretical model of change,[24],[31] 3D model of motivation for change,[25] stages-of-change model of motivation,[18] and social constructivist metatheory[30] were other theories that had been used to define motivation. Intrinsic and extrinsic terminology was used in the tools according to SDT.
Other studies had designed the tools based on other questionnaires[12],[28],[38],[39] or mixed methods.[11],[15],[26],[30],[40],[41],[42] Most of the studies had provided limited descriptions of how theories and guidelines were operationalized in tools. Qualitative research, interviews, and content analysis had been used for the development of a questionnaire[11],[17],[27],[29],[41] in 5 studies. Most questionnaires had been designed and suited in countries with English language and culture.[15],[17],[19],[24],[26],[27],[29],[32],[33],[34],[35],[38],[40],[41],[42],[43],[44] Studies in other cultures were limited to the Dutch,[12],[14],[16],[17],[18],[31],[36],[37] German,[20] Polish,[37] Chinese,[28] Italian,[25] Swedish,[11],[30] and Iranian cultures.[39] Definition of motivation: The definition of motivation varied considerably in different studies [Table 2] and [Table 3]. In the content analysis, 3 main categories were extracted which could reflect patient's motivation. These categories were motivation determinant factors, decision, and behavior [Table 1]. Motivation determinant factors: This include internal Determined factors (Autonomous, competency and dependency), individual trait and outcome expectancy, as the motives for which behavior is performed for its own purpose, and external factors (perceived pressures, potential predictor, gain, situational influences, interpersonal influences and Controlled situation) as the motives which behaviors are affected from external influences.
Decision: The decision explains how people form intentions, willingness, goal, and desire-related behaviors. Decision is a cognitive process related to motivation. Decision can be defined independently from the behavior it regulates. Behavior: Behavior is that which equates a patient's motivation with the exertion of effort. The sustained-effort perspective focuses on measuring seeking, engagement, change (get rid of a behavior), and readiness. It would have to refer to the effort and activity required in the treatment process. The findings from content analysis illustrated that internal and external motives provide the prologue to decisions, eventually, with a circular chain. This circular chain may begin with an internal factor, continue to a decision, and result in a behavior, and vice versa. According to the reviewed studies, interests, stimulants, sense of satisfaction, sense of control, willingness, and fear of consequences or even physical problems such as pain are common motives in clinical settings that influence patients' decisions. This will lead to behaviors such as using clinical services, seeking treatments and professional help, a healthy lifestyle, change in behaviors, and willingness or unwillingness to participate in interventions.
| Discussion | | |
In this scoping review, the concept of patients' motivation and the tools that have been designed to measure this concept in clinical settings are presented. The concept of motivation was ambiguous in most of the tools. There were no conceptual and operational definitions of motivation for nursing care. The findings from content analysis outlined the 3 categories of motivation determinant factors, decision, and behaviors. It is possible to design a short tool with general application that can be used in all diseases by using these categories.
Internal determined factors such as autonomy, competency dependency, individual traits, and outcome expectancy form decisions that are the cognitive process behind motivation. Decision is intention, willingness, goal, and desire to act a behavior in patients. It can be defined as a decision to action, active, readiness, seeking, and engagement during the treatment process. External factors such as perceived pressures, potential predictor, gain, situational influences, interpersonal influences, and controlled situation make a behavior to continue and become stable. This is a comprehensive definition of motivation; it consists of several theories such as theory of planned behavior, SDT, and stages of change.[19],[22],[31]
Motivation is not the only factor influencing the patient's behavior. Therefore, a patients might not “enter into, continue, and adhere to a specific change strategy”, because of external factors and internal factors, which are not under their volitional control. This definition pays attention to the effective factors in the formation of behavior and the continuation of behavior.
The tools assessed external factors and internal factors, but provided no insight into how to balance these types of factors in the clinical environment. Motivation is measurable in patients' behaviors. However, most of the tools were self-report tools. Motivation has behavioral components[14] and it can be defined in relation to the patient's behavior during the treatment process.[45],[46] Observable behavior of patients' motivation can be assessed more easily by nurses. The main point to keep in mind is that patients' behaviors are expected to be compliant with motivation. In fact, this compliance may be associated with unreal motivation in patient.
In most of the studies, researchers had used theories to define the concept of motivation. These theories have the potential to contribute to our understanding of the concept of patients' motivation. For example, SDT describes motivation as the concept that specifies varied motivational subtypes, ranging from those focused on external controls and rewards to those stemming from more internal values. Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and satisfaction are sometimes used as analogues for intrinsic motivation.[23],[45],[46] However, the application of these theories might be limited in chronic patients due to complex conditions such as the influence of time and lack of sufficient time for behavioral change. Further empirical evidence is needed to support the use of theories in evaluating and enhancing motivation in clinical settings.
The basic problem in the process of theory operationalization lies in the construction of tools that assess a patient's motivation and not its sources or the effects of the behavior itself. Such an approach has one undoubted advantage, the sources of patients' motivation processes can be monitored through psychological processes, whereas the effects of behaviors undergo cultural evaluation. Motivation is influenced by demographic characteristics and cultural conditions, so it is necessary to design motivation tools in different contexts in nursing. Moreover, patients' motivations fluctuate over time; thus, they should be conceptualized on an impermanent dimension, this requires that patients' motivations be conceptualized as depending on factors such as problem identification or outcome expectancies.[6],[11],[45],[46]
In this respect, the most important step is to design reliable and valid measurement tools for the assessment of patients' motivation in considering their experiences. All the concepts change over time and need to be re-defined for better application. Gathering qualitative information from health settings is imperative in order to understand how nurses, patients, and other health professionals comprehend and use patients' motivation concept in practice and in different cultures.[11] thus, a more accurate criterion can be achieved for assessing patient's motivation.[45]
Patients' motivation evaluation is essential for patient care. This scoping review was conducted to define motivation and its dimensions in clinical settings according to the published studies. There is a need for more comprehensive and hybrid studies on the concept of motivation and its measurement. The gap in knowledge limits the use of existing tools in nursing care.[11] In addition to general tools to assess patients' motivations, it seems nurses might need specific tools for the assessment of patients' motivations in different chronic conditions. The concept defined in this study can be helpful for researchers that are interested in designing a short tool for the measurement of motivation with general application.
This review was restricted to articles published in English. We did not include studies with synonyms of the term motivation in our review because of differences in conceptual constructs. As this article is a scoping review and not a systematic review, we did not critically appraise existing tools.
| Conclusion | | |
According to the present study results, motivations are the results of internal and external motives that lead to decisions and behaviors. Several tools exist that assess motivation in medical conditions. Nevertheless, most of them might not be appropriate for nurses because of limited scopes and ambiguity in definitions. Nurses need valid and reliable tools to classify levels of motivation among clients and recognize the need for motivation enhancing techniques as early as possible in the process of care. There is a need for the development and psychometric testing of more diverse questionnaires relating to motivation in the clinical environment, considering specific problems of different chronic conditions. Furthermore, general motivation tools should be designed that can be used in different conditions. We recommend the assessment of multi-dimensional aspects of patients' motivations using observational scales that can be easily applied by nurses across various medical conditions.
Acknowledgements
Authors wish to thank the deputy of Research of Kashan University of Medical Sciences for their support.
Financial support and sponsorship
Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
Conflicts of interest
Nothing to declare.
| References | | |
| 1. | Curran T, Appleton PR, Hill AP, Hall HK. Passion and burnout in elite junior soccer players: The mediating role of self-determined motivation. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol 2011;12:655-61.  |
| 2. | Freudenreich O. Psychiatric rehabilitation and recovery. Psychotic Disorders. Springer; 2020. p. 323-34. |
| 3. | Millere A, Puce A, Millere E, Zumente Z, Sudraba V, Deklava L, et al. Treatment motivation factor analysis of patients with substance use disorders in Latvia. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2014;159:298-302. |
| 4. | Danielson E, Melin-Johansson C, Modanloo M. Adherence to treatment in patients with chronic diseases: From alertness to persistence. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2019;7:248-57. |
| 5. | Gamboa E, Ruiz C, Trujillo M. Improving patient motivation towards physical rehabilitation treatments with playtherapy exergame. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018;249:140-7. |
| 6. | Kyngäs H, Mikkonen K, Kääriäinen M. The application of content analysis in nursing science research. Springer; 2019. |
| 7. | Pargament KI. Spirituality as an irreducible human motivation and process. Int J Psychol Relig 2013;23:271-81. |
| 8. | Bergman E, Berterö C. 'Grasp life again'. A qualitative study of the motive power in myocardial infarction patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003;2:303-10. |
| 9. | Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169:467-73. |
| 10. | Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. 2015. |
| 11. | Grahn B, Gard G. Content and concurrent validity of the motivation for change questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2008;18:68-78. |
| 12. | Boosman H, van Heugten CM, Winkens I, Smeets SM, Visser-Meily JM. Further validation of the motivation for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation questionnaire (MOT-Q) in patients with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2016;26:87-102. |
| 13. | Urbanoski KA, Wild TC. Assessing self-determined motivation for addiction treatment: Validity of the treatment entry questionnaire J Subst Abuse Treat 2012;43:70-9. |
| 14. | Gongora VC, DeWeert-van Oene GH, von Sternberg K, de Jong CA. Validation of the observational version of the motivation for treatment scale. J Behav Addict 2012;20:414-22. |
| 15. | Oddy M, Cattran C, Wood R. The development of a measure of motivational changes following acquired brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsycho 2008;30:568-75. |
| 16. | Jochems EC, Mulder CL, Duivenvoorden HJ, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, van Dam A. Measures of motivation for psychiatric treatment based on self-determination theory: Psychometric properties in Dutch psychiatric outpatients. Assessment 2014;21:494-510. |
| 17. | Clough-Gorr KM, Rakowski W, Clark M, Silliman RA. The Getting-Out-of-Bed (GoB) scale: A measure of motivation and life outlook in older adults with cancer. Psychosoc Oncol 2009;27:454-68. |
| 18. | Drieschner KH, Boomsma A. The treatment motivation scales for forensic outpatient treatment (TMS-F) construction and psychometric evaluation. Assessment 2008;15:224-41. |
| 19. | Rieger E, Touyz S. An investigation of the factorial structure of motivation to recover in anorexia nervosa using the Anorexia Nervosa Stages of Change Questionnaire. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2006;14:269-75. |
| 20. | Pauli D, Aebi M, Metzke CW, Steinhausen HC. Motivation to change, coping, and self-esteem in adolescent anorexia nervosa: A validation study of the Anorexia Nervosa Stages of Change Questionnaire (ANSOCQ). J Eat Disord 2017;5:11. |
| 21. | Geller J, Brown KE, Srikameswaran S, Piper W, Dunn EC. The psychometric properties of the readiness and motivation questionnaire: A symptom-specific measure of readiness for change in the eating disorders. Psychol Assess 2013;25:759-68. |
| 22. | Martinez E, Castro J, Bigorra A, Morer A, Calvo R, Vila M, et al. Assessing motivation to change in bulimia nervosa: The bulimia nervosa stages of change questionnaire. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2007;15:13-23. |
| 23. | Sansfaçon J, Fletcher É, Zuroff DC, Schmitz N, Miller A, Israel M, et al. Psychometric properties of the “Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Treatment Questionnaire” in women with eating disorders. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2019;27:306-14. |
| 24. | Pantalon MV, Nich C, Franckforter T, Carroll KM. The URICA as a measure of motivation to change among treatment-seeking individuals with concurrent alcohol and cocaine problems. Psychol Addict Behav 2002;16:299-307. |
| 25. | Spiller V, Zavan V, Guelfi GP. Assessing motivation for change in subjects with alcohol problems: The MAC2-A questionnaire. Alcohol Alcohol 2006;41:616-23. |
| 26. | Miller WR, Tonigan JS. Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The stages of change readiness and treatment eagerness scale (SOCRATES). APAJ; 1997. |
| 27. | Chervinsky AB, Ommaya AK, deJonge M, Spector J, Schwab K, Salazar AM. Motivation for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation questionnaire (MOT-Q): Reliability, factor analysis, and relationship to MMPI-2 variables. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998;13:433-46. |
| 28. | Siu K, Lopez V. Intrinsic motivation inventory: Translation and validation in Chinese women with urinary incontinence. Int J Urol Nurs 2010;4:39-46. |
| 29. | Sarma S, Hawthorne G, Thakkar K, Hayes W, Moore KH. The development of an incontinence treatment motivation questionnaire for patients undergoing pelvic floor physiotherapy in the treatment of stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2009;20:1085-93. |
| 30. | Gard G, Rivano M, Grahn B. Development and reliability of the motivation for change questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:967-76. |
| 31. | De Weert-Van Oene GH, Schippers GM, De Jong CA. Motivation for treatment in substance-dependent patients. Eur Addict Res 2002;8:2-9. |
| 32. | Ferron JC, Elbogen EB, Swanson JW, Swartz MS, McHugo GJ. A conceptually based scale to measure consumers' treatment motivation. Res Soc Work Pract 2011;21:98-105. |
| 33. | Ryan RM, Plant RW, O'Malley S. Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement, and dropout. Addict Behav 1995;20:279-97. |
| 34. | Choi J, Mogami T, Medalia A. Intrinsic motivation inventory: An adapted measure for schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull 2010;36:966-76. |
| 35. | Pelletier LG, Tuson KM, Haddad NK. Client motivation for therapy scale: A measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. J Pers Assess 1997;68:414-35. |
| 36. | Drieschner K, Boomsma A. Validation of the treatment motivation scales for forensic outpatient treatment (TMS-F). Assessment 2008;15:242-55. |
| 37. | Zycinska J, Januszek M, Jurczyk M, Syska-Suminska J. How to measure motivation to change risk behaviours in the self-determination perspective? The Polish adaptation of the treatment self-regulation questionnaire (TSRQ) among patients with chronic diseases. Pol Psychol Bull 2012;4:261-71. |
| 38. | Keijsers G, Schaap C, Hoogsteyns B, Kemp E. Preliminary results of a new instrument to assess patient motivation for treatment in cognitive-behaviour therapy. Behav Cogn Psychother 1999;27:165-79. |
| 39. | Derakhshanrad SA, Piven E. Modification of the Persian version of Hermans achievement motivation questionnaire to develop an adapted scale for measuring motivation of post-stroke survivors in Iran. Iran J Neurol 2016;15:189-94. |
| 40. | Fehnel SE, Bann CM, Hogue SL, Kwong WJ, Mahajan SS. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Motivation and Energy Inventory (MEI). Qual Life Res 2004;13:1321-36. |
| 41. | El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, El Aroussy N. Meaningful patient engagement in inflammatory arthritis: Development of the patient motivation questionnaire. Clin Rheumatol 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3605-x. |
| 42. | Van Beek N, Verheul R. Motivation for treatment in patients with personality disorders. J Pers Disord 2008;22:89-100. |
| 43. | Kearney CA, Cook LC, Chapman G, Bensaheb A. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Motivation Assessment Scale and Resident Choice Assessment Scale. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2006;18(1):1-11. |
| 44. | Gusella J, Butler G, Nichols L, Bird D. A brief questionnaire to assess readiness to change in adolescents with eating disorders: its applications to group therapy. Eur Eat Disord Rev . 2003;11(1):58-71. |
| 45. | Scheffer D, Heckhausen H. Trait theories of motivation. Motivation and action: Springer; 2018. p. 67-112. |
| 46. | Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp Educ Psychol 2020;61:101860. |
[Figure 1]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|
Search Pubmed for