Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3182
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 27  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 560-566

Explaining the psychological distress of women with high-risk pregnancies in Iran: A qualitative study


1 Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
4 Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Date of Submission25-Sep-2021
Date of Decision19-Dec-2021
Date of Acceptance21-Sep-2022
Date of Web Publication18-Nov-2022

Correspondence Address:
Zahra Motaghi
Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_321_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Psychological Distress (PD) is one of the most common mental disorders during pregnancy and involves stress, anxiety, and depression. According to the literature, High-Risk Pregnancy' (HRP) is a major physiological risk factor associated with PD during pregnancy. The main purpose of this study was to explore the perception and experience of women with HRP who, based on standard questionnaires, had moderate-to-severe stress and anxiety scores. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study was conducted using conventional content analysis from December 2020 to June 2021. To this aim, 16 women with HRP were purposefully selected from Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz, Iran, with maximum diversity. In-depth, semi-structured, individual interviews were conducted to collect the data. The MAXQDA software was used for data analysis. Results: Data analysis led to the extraction of two main categories and nine subcategories. “Disrupted peace” and “inefficient adaptation to the situation” were the two extracted categories. The former included the five subcategories of concerns about pregnancy complications, concerns about the parenting process, concerns about the couple's relationship, fear of Covid-19, and occupation-related stress. The latter included the three subcategories of unpleasant feelings, current pregnancy experiences, and previous pregnancy experiences. Conclusions: This study highlighted a wide range of psychosocial factors involved in the PD of women with HRP. These findings can be used to design appropriate prevention strategies to manage the mental health problems of these women in order to turn their pregnancy into a pleasurable experience.

Keywords: High-risk pregnancy, Iran, psychological distress, qualitative research


How to cite this article:
Mohammadi S, Shojaei K, Maraghi E, Motaghi Z. Explaining the psychological distress of women with high-risk pregnancies in Iran: A qualitative study. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res 2022;27:560-6

How to cite this URL:
Mohammadi S, Shojaei K, Maraghi E, Motaghi Z. Explaining the psychological distress of women with high-risk pregnancies in Iran: A qualitative study. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 1];27:560-6. Available from: https://www.ijnmrjournal.net/text.asp?2022/27/6/560/361476




  Introduction Top


High-Risk Pregnancy (HRP) is considered to be a major public health challenge, and addressing the healthcare needs in areas where HRP occurs is an objective of Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG 3).[1] HRP has been defined as “any pregnancy in which there is a medical factor, maternal or fetal, that potentially acts adversely to affect the outcome of pregnancy”.[2] It is estimated that about 15 to 20% of women experience HRP.[3] HRP is a major physiological risk factor associated with Psychological Distress (PD) during pregnancy. However, other risk factors such as environmental, physical, biological, social, and psychological factors can predispose a person to PD in the prenatal period, during childbirth, or after childbirth.[4] PD can be described as stress, depression, anxiety, or the experience of an adverse life event and is classified as mild, moderate, and severe.[5] Mild-to-moderate PD is usually controlled through primary healthcare services, while more severe cases are referred for specialized mental health services.[6] According to the literature, PD is more common in cases of domestic violence, history of abortion, stillbirth, unwanted pregnancy, drug use, lack of community support, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and over 35 years of age, which complicate pregnancy.[5] Fairbrother et al.[7] reported that anxiety and stress are 5.2 times higher in women with HRP than in women with normal pregnancies. Simmons and Goldberg reported that the label of HRP alone is associated with higher PD and may cause the onset or recurrence of some serious mental disorders in some women.[8] When the severity of maternal complications increases, the mother needs to be hospitalized for a long time to receive care and medical attention, but this is associated with increased concerns and will eventually lead to additional stress and aggravation of psychological symptoms.[7] The prevalence of antenatal depression is about 13%, but can reach 19% among women hospitalized due to the risk of obstetric complications.[9] Overall, previous studies have shown the importance of frequent screening of women with HRP in terms of PD because PD can have negative impacts on the mental health and well-being of pregnant women, children, and their families.[10] It seems that PD can lead to a decrease in self-efficacy, self-esteem, and hope in pregnant women and as a result reduce their psychological capacity.[11] PD is associated with increased risk of maternal and fetal problems such as preterm delivery, low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction, fetal asphyxia, a complicated delivery, impaired maternal–fetal attachment, and postpartum depression, which may have adverse effects on the child's behavioral development.[12]

Reflection on the available sources shows that the majority of available resources on PD are quantitative and are intended to test the methods that may reduce the distress level and its complications in pregnancy, but the most provoking factors of PD and its dimensions have been neglected in most of them.[13] Since PD during pregnancy has different cultural, social, economic, and medical dimensions,[5] qualitative studies focusing on the specific cultural differences of each region are essential in order to discover in depth the various dimensions of PD in women with HRP. Ahvaz city, Iran, with a variety of different ethnic and cultural groups is a suitable environment for this study. Based on examples of PD, strategies can be developed to promote health and improve the quality of life of women with HRP. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the perception and experience of women with HRP who had moderate-to-severe stress and anxiety scores based on a standard questionnaire.


  Materials and Methods Top


This qualitative descriptive research was part of a multistage mixed-method study that investigated the perinatal care program for women with high-risk pregnancies in Iran. This qualitative study was conducted from December 2020 to June 2021 using conventional content analysis method. Conventional qualitative content analysis is based on induction and is used when existing theories or research texts about the phenomenon under study are not sufficient, and the researcher wants to provide the necessary background knowledge in this regard. In such cases, researchers avoid using presupposed categories and instead arrange for the categories to be derived from real data.[14] The study setting was the perinatology ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Ahvaz (southwestern Iran). This center is a teaching tertiary referral hospital in Khuzestan Province of Iran, with approximately 6700 births and 15000 obstetric triage visits annually.[12] Participants were selected from among 150 women with HRP admitted to the perinatology ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital and who had completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) questionnaire in the study aimed at “evaluating the perinatal care program for women with high-risk pregnancies” and were qualified to enter the qualitative study. The study inclusion criteria for this study included HRP (any type of maternal or fetal risk), gestational age ≥28 weeks, scoring of more than 50% on both questionnaires (28 for PSS and 50 for STAI), the ability to describe the experience in Persian, and willingness to participate in the interview.

The 14-item PSS was used to assess perceived stress. The items of this questionnaire are scored based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 (never = 0, low = 1, moderate = 2, high = 3, and very high = 4). The total score of this questionnaire ranges between 0 and 56. The validity and reliability of this instrument have been confirmed by Malakouti et al.[15] The STAI designed by Spielberger et al. was used to measure the participants' level of anxiety. This inventory consists of the two sections of state (situational) and trait (personal) anxiety. In this assessment, the 20 questions related to state anxiety (transient emotion depending on specific circumstances) were used. The items of the STAI are scored based on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4. Thus, the total obtained anxiety score ranges between 20 and 80.[16] The validity and reliability of this instrument have been confirmed by Makvandi et al.[17] Assessments of maternal anxiety and stress were performed, on average, 4 days after admission.

In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted to collect the required data. All interviews were performed by the first author who had the experience of interacting with patients in perinatology wards as a clinical instructor. First, an appointment was made to interview each participant, and then, face-to-face interviews were conducted individually at a time and place convenient to the participant in the study setting. Interviews were initiated with general questions, and then, moved toward more in-depth inquires based on participants' answers and the purpose of the study. All participants completed a demographic questionnaire before participating in the interviews which were recorded with their permission. An interview guide was tailored to the purpose of the study. The interview began with an open-ended question (“Can you speak a bit about how this high-risk pregnancy affects you emotionally/psychologically?”). Then, the interviewer added questions such as “What causes you the most stress and anxiety?”, and then, based on their answers and using other probing questions (“Can you give an example?”), they were asked to explain the effects of stress and anxiety in more detail. Each interview lasted between 45 and 60 minutes. Data collection was continued until data saturation, which was achieved after interviewing 13 participants. However, three more interviews were conducted to ensure that saturation was reached; they produced no new data.

MAXQDA software (version 10; VERBI GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was used for data analysis. Inductive data analysis was performed simultaneously with data collection. For this purpose, the conventional content analysis method introduced by Elo and Kyngäs was used.[14] In this method, codes and categories are derived directly from the raw data. Thus, immediately after each interview, the whole interview was transcribed verbatim. Each interview was read several times to identify meaning units, and then, the meaning units were labeled and coded. Subsequently, meaning units and codes were classified according to conceptual and semantic similarities. Categories and subcategories were compared. Finally, themes were extracted from the analysis and interpretation of data and matched to the overarching categories related to the guideline, the individual, the cultural and social context, and the organization.[18] All initial coding was made by the first author (SM). She periodically met with the research team during the coding process to discuss and review the coding scheme and synthesis of codes at a higher level. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, the four criteria of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability were taken into account, using the methods proposed by Lincoln and Guba.[19] In order to validate the data, a sufficient amount of time was dedicated to data collection, and sampling was performed considering maximum diversity (in terms of age, level of education, any type of maternal-fetal risk, and ethnicity) and continued until data saturation. The coded texts were made available to external observers who were proficient in qualitative research as well as the subject matter in order to ensure the reliability of data. Efforts were also made to maintain data transferability by fully describing the characteristics of the participants, sampling methods, and data collection.

Ethical considerations

The study is part of the PhD dissertation of the first author in reproductive health, which was financially supported by Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran (Approval ID: IR.SHMU.REC.1399.123). After explaining the objectives of the study to the participants, informed written consent was obtained from them for the interview. They were informed that their participation in the research was optional and that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any stage.


  Results Top


The results of this study were obtained from 16 interviews. [Table 1] shows the demographic characteristics of the participants. The PD of women with HRP was divided into the two main categories of disrupted peace and inefficient adaptation to the situation [Table 2], which are described below.
Table 1: Participants' characteristics

Click here to view
Table 2: A brief report of the development of the categories

Click here to view


Disrupted peace

Data analysis indicated that several factors, including concerns about pregnancy complications, the parenting process, the couple's relationship, and contracting a disease, play a role in the PD of women with HRP. Most of the mothers who participated in this study believed that pregnancy is a stressful event that is accompanied with anxiety and worry.

- Worries about pregnancy complications

According to the study participants, fear and anxiety about the effects of pregnancy complications on the health of the fetus and mother was an important factor in their psychological distress. Some participants reported the fear of stillbirth and mental retardation of the fetus as a cause for concern. In this regard, a participant said:“Because of low amniotic fluid, the doctors said that we should have preterm labor, in which case, the baby's chance of survival is low” [Participant (p 6)].

Participant 2 attributed her anxiety to the fear of neonatal birth trauma. “I have diabetes and the baby is overweight. The doctors here have told me that the baby will get stuck in the birth canal, and this will damage his hand” (p 2).

Participant 4 stated that she was disturbed, anxious, and apprehensive about the possible effects of pregnancy on their health. “The imaging [MRI] showed that my placenta is very sticky. The doctors said that they may have to remove my uterus [hysterectomy]” (p 4).

- Worries about the parenting process

Parenting responsibilities along with family financial problems and the high costs associated with pregnancy (screening, ultrasound, etc.) were other factors that caused fear and anxiety. A respondent stated:“I am anxious and worried about whether I have the ability needed to care for a premature baby” (p 10).

Regarding these problems, A 31-year-old mother stated: “In such economic conditions, the cost of tests, ultrasound, etc., has become very high and has put a lot of pressure on our family” (p 12).

And another participant said: “Despite having two children with mental retardation, despite the doctor's serious advice to perform additional tests and sonography [screenings], due to financial problems and lack of insurance plans, I did not do them” (p 16).

- Worries about the couple's relationship

Fear of emotional distance, infidelity, and ignored gender role and the related problems were other issues mentioned by participants which caused psychological distress. In this regard, participant 8 said: “Under these conditions (frequent hospitalization), I have forgotten that I am a woman who has the role of a wife” (p 8).

Another 29-year-old woman stated: “Since I have been hospitalized here, I am afraid and anxious that our relationship is turning cold and we are growing distant from each other” (p 7).

Another participant said: “In this long hospital stay, thousands of thoughts have come to my mind, I keep thinking that I hope he does not have a relationship with another woman during this time” (p 15).

- Fear of getting Covid-19

Fear and anxiety associated with Covid-19 infection during hospitalization and care (due to non-compliance of some patients with health protocols) were other causes of maternal PD in addition to the stress associated with pregnancy complications. A 38-year-old woman said: “Now in addition to worrying about preterm birth, I am also concerned about Corona and its effects on myself and the fetus” (p 1).

- Occupation-related stress

Dissatisfaction with paid leave and worries about losing their job were other concerns of the participants. In this regard, participant 3 said: “I need frequent follow-ups, but due to lack of manpower and my colleagues' getting Corona in the current situation, my paid leave request has not been approved” (p 3).

And participant 10 stated: “I have a temporary job and with all these sick leaves and frequent hospitalizations, I will probably lose my job” (p 10).

Inefficient adaptation to the situation

According to the participants' statements, unpleasant experiences in previous pregnancies, concern about the ambiguous situation ahead due to lack of accurate information, and problems related to being away from home were the cause of their PD and dysfunctional incompatibility with their current situation.

- Unpleasant feelings

Fear of the new environment, feeling homesick and lonely in a city other than one's hometown, difficulty in resting for a long time in the hospital and away from family, and being deprived of many foods as recommended by the doctor were factors reported as causes of low mood and unpleasant feelings toward the new situation. Participant 6 said: “I am always afraid of new environments. Now that I am here in this new environment (the hospital), I am scared” (p 6).

“Here (the city I was sent to), the feeling of loneliness and homelessness has exhausted me” (p 5).

One respondent declared: “I am on complete bed rest during this pregnancy. All my normal social activities are limited” (p 14).

A woman said in this regard: “Because of my obesity, I am on a strict diet that has made me impatient, bored, and depressed” (p 11).

- Previous pregnancy experiences

Thinking about the negative experiences of previous pregnancies, like inappropriate staff behavior, was one of the causes of inefficient adaptation to the situation. A 29-year-old mother said: “In my previous pregnancy, my baby was stillborn; now, coming here has brought back all the bitter memories of the past” (p 7).

Moreover,a 27-year-old mother said: “I was here in my previous abortion, and the midwife who is on duty now, kept shouting at me at that time because I was crying out of pain, and said this is simply an abortion” (p 13).

- Current pregnancy experiences

Medical negligence, lack of appropriate interaction with the client, and failure to respond to and share information with the client were the causes of anxiety, stress, and tension for some mothers. The presence of capable healthcare professionals and the provision of quality care (providing effective, efficient, and cost-effective health services) could play an important role in meeting the mentioned needs and expectations of the clients, which, in turn, will lead to their satisfaction with the services and reduced stress and anxiety. One participant noted: “My first child had a heart problem. Despite the fact that the doctor knew about my first child's problem and I was under her supervision, she did not recommend an echo test, so I did not do it during this pregnancy.” (p 12).

One respondent stated: “I was scheduled to have a cesarean section to end my pregnancy, but they are just procrastinating, and when I or my family ask the staff when I will have the cesarean section, they do not give a direct answer” (p 5).

Moreover, a 20-year-old mother said: “When I asked the midwives about the reason for prescribing a medicine or ordering a test, they said angrily: 'we do not know; if you have something to say, talk to the doctor” (p 9).


  Discussion Top


Our results highlighted several psychosocial factors that may cause significant PD and debilitating PD in women with HRP, but are not sufficient to ensure their referral to mental health services. Participants noted concern about the effects of pregnancy complications on maternal and/or fetal health as a cause of PD. A study by Penacoba-Puente et al.[20] in Spain also showed that mothers who had an unwanted pregnancy or had a history of miscarriage were more concerned about the health of their fetus, which is consistent with the results of the present study. Shojaeian et al.[21] reported that the possibility of fetal vulnerability to different risk factors (i.e., preterm delivery, fetal death, and hospitalization in the NICU) was a concern of mothers with HRP. Fear of fetal injury during the delivery process was the cause of maternal anxiety and the desire to have a cesarean section in this study. Arfaie et al.[13] also found that the fear of fetal injury was one of the main reasons for the selection of cesarean section by many mothers.

Another major cause of distress in mothers was related to their relationship with their spouse. According to Smorti et al., not being able to be close and involved with their partners was a cause of anxiety and stress in women with HRP requiring hospitalization.[22] Rosario et al.[23] and Karamoozian et al.[24] also pointed to the role of incomplete sex in anxiety during pregnancy, which is in line with the findings of the present study. Despite the many sexual problems in pregnancy and the significant impact of marital satisfaction on the mental health of pregnant women, most women do not use sexual counseling during their pregnancy.[25] Job loss was another cause of distress perceived by the participants. Lack of financial security to meet the current and future needs of the family and the children significantly affects the incidence of mood disorders.[26] There is considerable evidence that mental health conditions in women are associated with social conditions such as poverty, violence, and economic dependence.[27] Concerns about parental responsibility (including caring for and interacting with a premature child) were among the factors causing psychological distress. This issue has also been identified as a cause of maternal anxiety in the studies by Borghei et al.[25] and Arfaie et al.[28] In Iran, prenatal and postpartum care training focuses on the physical health of the baby and simple health issues, and there is no structured program to facilitate the optimal transition to the parental stage and to promote mothers' sense of self-efficacy.[29] Another factor identified was the high cost associated with pregnancy (tests and screening) and the economic problems of families. Being concerned about paying for fees related to transportation, medicine, extra care during pregnancy, and childcare were mentioned as causes of maternal anxiety in the study by Rosario et al.[22]

However, Martini et al. found no significant relationship between economic factors and anxiety.[30] Another factor was the health risks associated with Covid-19. In this respect, Mappa et al. found that the COVID-19 epidemic doubled the number of women with abnormal levels of anxiety. In their study, the fear that COVID-19 could induce fetal structural abnormalities was reported.[31] We found that fear of the repetition of the negative consequences of a previous pregnancy (such as infant death) was another cause of maternal PD. In the study by Shojaeian et al, mothers stated that any negative experiences during their previous pregnancy or those they had only heard about could be a cause of stress and perceiving a greater risk.[32] Medical negligence and failure to respond to and share information with the client were other known PD factors. In the study conducted by Rosario et al. in Tanzania, lack of awareness and information about pregnancy and infant care was a major concern for many participants.[23] According to Arfaie et al.,[13] there is a significant relationship between attitudes toward the quality of healthcare services and pregnancy anxiety.

Lack of appropriate interaction between the service provider and the client was a distress factor, which is in line with results of Smorti et al.[22] Therefore, the quality of this interaction should be revised. In the study by Arfaie et al.,[28] the skills, behaviors, and responses of the medical staff were the causes of maternal anxiety. Sereshti et al.[33] also found that a lack of understanding of the mother's condition and poor communication between the treatment team in the obstetrics and gynecology wards contributed to mothers' problems and exacerbated their distress and anxiety. The relationship between the client and service provider which is based on trust provides clients with the opportunity to talk freely and openly about their thoughts, feelings, and problems. Participants also reported agoraphobic behaviors (such as homesickness and fear of new environments). However, none of the women in this study were diagnosed with agoraphobia which is defined clinically as “fear of leaving the safe environment of the home. or being in a public place”.[34] Khorsandi et al.[35] found that fear of the hospital environment was the main cause of fear of health care and loneliness during childbirth.

The structures obtained in this study, like other qualitative studies, are context-sensitive (Iran) which may affect the transferability of the findings. However, sampling was performed with maximum diversity. Another limitation of this study was interviewing bilingual mothers (Arabic–Persian), so it was not possible to gain the experiences of mothers who only spoke Arabic. In future studies, it is recommended that the components and dimensions of this kind of psychological distress of HRP be explained from the perspective of the spouse, family members, and caregiver.


  Conclusion Top


The psychological status of women with HRP can affect their ability and likelihood of following instructions and taking care of themselves during and after pregnancy. Our results highlighted a wide range of psychosocial factors contributing to PD in women with HRP. These findings can be used to design appropriate prevention strategies to manage and control the mental health problems of these women in order to turn their pregnancy into a pleasurable experience.

Acknowledgements

The present study is part of the PhD dissertation of the first author (SM) in reproductive health, which was financially supported by Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran (code: 860). The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their cooperation.

Financial support and sponsorship

Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud

Conflicts of interest

Nothing to declare.



 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable: report of the third global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization. (2017).  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Holness NJNC. High-risk pregnancy. Nurs Clin North Am 2018;53:241-51.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Isaacs NZ, Andipatin MG. A systematic review regarding women's emotional and psychological experiences of high-risk pregnancies. BMC Psychol 2020;8:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Araji S, Griffin A, Dixon L, Spencer S-K, Peavie C, Wallace K, et al. An overview of maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the post-partum period. J Ment Health Clin Psychol 2020;4.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Vehmeijer FO, Guxens M, Duijts L, El Marroun H. Maternal psychological distress during pregnancy and childhood health outcomes: A narrative review. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2019;10:274-85.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Howard LM, Megnin-Viggars O, Symington I, Pilling S, Guideline Development Group. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: Summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ 2014;349:g7394. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7394.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Fairbrother N, Young AH, Zhang A, Janssen P, Antony MM. The prevalence and incidence of perinatal anxiety disorders among women experiencing a medically complicated pregnancy. Arch Womens Ment Health 2017;20:311-9.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Simmons HA, Goldberg LS. 'High-risk'pregnancy after perinatal loss: Understanding the label. Midwifery 2011;27:452-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Tsakiridis I, Bousi V, Dagklis T, Sardeli C, Nikolopoulou V, Papazisis G, et al. Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: A scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;300:849-59.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Taebi M, Simbar M, Abdolahian S. Psychological empowerment strategies in infertile women: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot 2018;7:68. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_151_15.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Garcia ER, Stoever JK, Wang P, Yim IS. Empowerment, stress, and depressive symptoms among female survivors of intimate partner violence attending personal empowerment programs. J Interpers Violence 2021;36:9557-79.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Lima SAM, El Dib RP, Rodrigues MRK, Ferraz GAR, Molina AC, Neto CAP, et al. Is the risk of low birth weight or preterm labor greater when maternal stress is experienced during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. PLoS One 2018;13:e0200594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0200594.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Arfaie K, Nahidi F, Simbar M, Bakhtiari M. The role of fear of childbirth in pregnancy related anxiety in Iranian women: A qualitative research. Electron Physician 2017;9:3733-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Armat MR, Assarroudi A, Rad M, Sharifi H, Heydari A. Inductive and deductive: Ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis. Qual Rep 2018;23:219-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Malakouti J, Sehhati F, Mirghafourvand M, Nahangi R. Relationship between health promoting lifestyle and perceived stress in pregnant women with preeclampsia. J Caring Sci 2015;4:155-63.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Shahid, A., Wilkinson, K., Marcu, S., & Shapiro, C. M. State-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). In STOP, THAT and one hundred other sleep scales (pp. 367-368). Springer, New York, NY. (2011).  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Makvandi S, Zargar Shoshtari S, Montazeri S, Ahangarpour A. The effect of chewing sugar-free gum on the anxiety level of active phase of labor in nulliparous women. Razi J Med Sci 2013;20:9-15.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi M. Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs 2018;23:42-55.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
STAHL, Norman A.; KING, James R. Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education 2020,44.1:  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Peñacoba-Puente C, Monge FJC, Morales DM. Pregnancy worries: A longitudinal study of Spanish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1030-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Shojaeian Z, Khadivzadeh T, Sahebi A, Kareshki H, Tara F. Perceived risk in women with high risk pregnancy: A qualitative study. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2021;26:168.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Smorti M, Ginobbi F, Simoncini T, Pancetti F, Carducci A, Mauri G, et al. Anxiety and depression in women hospitalized due to high-risk pregnancy: An integrative quantitative and qualitative study. Curr Psychol 2021:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01902-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Rosario MK, Premji SS, Nyanza EC, Bouchal SR, Este D. A qualitative study of pregnancy-related anxiety among women in Tanzania. BMJ Open 2017;7:e016072.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Karamoozian M, Askarizadeh G, Darekordi A. The impact of prenatal group stress management therapy on anxiety in mothers and newborns physiological parameters. 2015.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Borghei NS, Taghipour A, Latifnejad Roudsari R. The concern of fetal health: Women's experiences of worries during pregnancy. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2016;19:10-21.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Deklava L, Lubina K, Circenis K, Sudraba V, Millere I. Causes of anxiety during pregnancy. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2015;205:623-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Howard LM, Khalifeh H. Perinatal mental health: A review of progress and challenges. World Psychiatry 2020;19:313-27.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Arfaie K, Nahidi F, Simbar M. Understanding mothers' perceptions of pregnancy anxiety: A qualitative study. Electronic Physician 2019;11:7620-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Azmoude E, Jaafarnejad F, Mazloum SJEBC. Effect of self-efficacy-based training on maternal sense of competency of primiparous women in the infants care. Evid Based Care 2014;4:7-14.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Martini J, Petzoldt J, Einsle F, Beesdo-Baum K, Höfler M, Wittchen H-U. Risk factors and course patterns of anxiety and depressive disorders during pregnancy and after delivery: A prospective-longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2015;175:385-95.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mappa I, Distefano FA, Rizzo G. Effects of coronavirus 19 pandemic on maternal anxiety during pregnancy: A prospectic observational study. J Perinat Med 2020;48:545-50.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Shojaeian Z, Khadivzadeh T, Sahebi A, Kareshki H, Tara F. Knowledge valuation by iranian women with high-risk pregnancy: A qualitative content analysis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery 2020;8:243-52.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sereshti M, Nahidi F, Simbar M, Ahmadi F, Bakhtiari M, Zayeri F. Mothers' perception of quality of services from health centers after perinatal loss. Electron Physician 2016;8:2006-17.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Malhi GS, Bassett D, Boyce P, Bryant R, Fitzgerald PB, Fritz K, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand college of psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2015;49:1087-206.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Khorsandi M, Vakilian K, NasirzadehMasooleh M. Investigating different factors of fear in normal delivery among pregnant women, in arak-a cross sectional study. J Fasa Univ Med Sci 2014;4:161-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed132    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal